Tommy said:It’s ok to nominate someone primarily because of gender & skin color, as long as it’s not a white male? Assuming there are better qualified candidates that aren’t black & female, isn’t that blatant discrimination? Didn’t MLK say judge on character, not skin color? Seems like we’re headed backwards from the ideals of MLK, and our culture is focused on the differences, instead of what we all have in common.
Tommy said:We’ll, at least it’s not KH, she’s either a f’n idiot or overly arrogant, maybe both
DocZaius said:Well, isn’t this interesting.
https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/ketanji-jackson-montrose-christian/
I wonder if she’ll get the same treatment that Amy Coney Barrett did for being connected to a Christian group. This one explicitly denies trannyism and homosexuality, and seem to be pro-life - which seems at odds with this Administration’s priorities.
But I suppose that’s what you get when your only criteria is that the nominee be a proud woman of color.
Juggs said:Psaki is such a condescending, insufferable cunt.
Evil gator said:Juggs said:Psaki is such a condescending, insufferable cunt.
her doubling down on "green" energy is so ridic. I wish someone would press this admin on the fact they are denying mining permits for key components of solar and wind.