Politics Politics

Apparently the person that did the interview has a history of sketchy sexual interactions, at least one accusation of rape.
 
Here's the details: https://www.reduxx.info/post/trans-r-antiwork-moderator-admitted-to-serial-rape-allegations

In the first, Ford states that one person accusing him of rape had been intoxicated but allegedly told him that "it wasn't a big deal" if they engaged in sexual activity anyway. Ford states that he "took them at their word" and had sex with the individual despite their inebriated state, taking them to be "consenting." The person later would then accuse him of sexual assault, to which Ford responds that he will be "more responsible in the future when it comes to alcohol."

In a second Facebook post, Ford says he had been in an ongoing relationship with a person who had a history of trauma which caused "emotional and physical distance" between them. Ford writes that as a result, his sexual needs were "going unmet." He goes on to say that because of his lack of sexual access, he began chronically masturbating as a coping mechanism.

"After months of trying to keep myself in check, I began sporadically masturbating while they slept next to me," he writes in the undated Facebook post, noting that the individual made it clear that they were uncomfortable with the situation, but that he continued despite the warnings. At one point, Ford put his sleeping partner's hand on his genitals.

Later in the post, Ford says his partner installed alarms to try and prevent them from falling asleep in the same room, but that he actively shut the alarms off out of a "desperation for emotional intimacy."
Click to expand...

WTF? Imagine being so creeped out by your boyfriend/girlfriend/whatever that you don't want to fall asleep in the same room as them.
 
None of that sounds right. First, if your not banging your girlfriend, you don't care for each other. Just end the f'n relationship. Next, what a cunt of a woman to be upset that her boyfriend would masterbate beside of her. How is that anything other than potentially normal behavior :lol:
 
Juggs said:
None of that sounds right. First, if your not banging your girlfriend, you don't care for each other. Just end the f'n relationship. Next, what a cunt of a woman to be upset that her boyfriend would masterbate beside of her. How is that anything other than potentially normal behavior :lol:
Click to expand...

Stop assuming genders!!!
 
People on the left have been brainwashed into thinking that everyone on the right is a racist sexist homophobe. It’s so pervasive. If cons are so racist, why is Clarence Thomas the favorite scotus judge of every con I know? It’s all so fucking stupid. 99% of cons don’t give a shit
 
Anyone seen this? This is the new idiocy, people who don’t see a need for energy or capitalism or cops or any obvious modern necessity. Here’s one of them and everyone is dunking and it’s beautiful

https://twitter.com/atrembath/status/1487087031238860805?s=21
 
I’ve never seen an administration work harder to act like they are doing something rather than actually solve the problem

https://twitter.com/thelastrefuge2/status/1486783226232381442?s=21

Trump was a braggy show off, but actually tried to solve problems (or build a wall, cut thru red tape to get a vaccine).
 
Evil gator said:
Anyone seen this? This is the new idiocy, people who don’t see a need for energy or capitalism or cops or any obvious modern necessity. Here’s one of them and everyone is dunking and it’s beautiful

https://twitter.com/atrembath/status/1487087031238860805?s=21
Click to expand...

I read an article that something like 90% or more of Americans couldn’t afford an unexpected $500 expense.

But hey, 10% of us should have a half acre and pay raise a bunch of hens. They barely even make half acre lots anymore without costing a fortune. And if you have the room for half acre lots, predators will be a regular problem for hens if you let them free range. And even free range, you’d still go through $30/mo in chicken feed.

Delusional.
 
Yeah it’s like so many ideas on the left, someone with an expensive useless liberal indoctrination degree(s) but thinks they are smartest comes up with a “solution” that every other dumb lib loves (cop kills black guy- defund all police!!!) that isn’t based on any logic or sound policy but hits some buzZy touch point like screw corporations! or climate change! Or equity! and they all line up and if you disagree you’re the dumb one
 
Evil gator said:
Yeah it’s like so many ideas on the left, someone with an expensive useless liberal indoctrination degree(s) but thinks they are smartest comes up with a “solution” that every other dumb lib loves (cop kills black guy- defund all police!!!) that isn’t based on any logic or sound policy but hits some buzZy touch point like screw corporations! or climate change! Or equity! and they all line up and if you disagree you’re the dumb one
Click to expand...

I've been listening to a youtuber, a black woman...30ish maybe? That was raised and used to be a liberal and get mad about all the typical shit until she saw the light. Now all she does is shows breaking down the illogical lunacy of the left and how black people are brainwashed by their lies. They're nice because it's only a 10-15 minute video most of the time. This is a good one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vsu2jVYsEv8
 
Law professor Ilya Shapiro getting investigated for stating the obvious.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/01/31/georgetown-law-ilya-shapiro-administrative-leave/
 
Doc it gets better and better

https://twitter.com/richlowry/status/1488613020238598147?s=21

Keep in mind this is all happening while Whoopi Goldberg said the holocaust wasn’t about race and has doubled down with a lot of stupid shit and probably won’t be fired but this prof will
 
Faculty letter (signed by 148 faculty from various Universities) in support of Shapiro:

Dear Dean Treanor:

We understand that some have called for Ilya Shapiro to be fired from his position as Executive Director of the Georgetown Center for the Constitution, because of his tweet criticizing President Biden’s pledge to appoint a black woman as a Justice. We think such a firing—or subjecting Shapiro to disciplinary action of any kind based on his tweet—would be contrary to basic academic freedom principles, which Georgetown rightly applies (1) to “all faculty,” including “lecturer” such as Shapiro, and not just tenure-track faculty, and (2) to “professional service” and “all the domains of [faculty] academic activity,” which would include public commentary by public intellectuals, and not just “research” and “teaching.”


https://www.thefire.org/faculty-letter-in-support-of-ilya-shapiro-january-31-2022/
 
Letter of support for Shapiro signed by 148 faculty members from various Universities:


Dear Dean Treanor:

We understand that some have called for Ilya Shapiro to be fired from his position as Executive Director of the Georgetown Center for the Constitution, because of his tweet criticizing President Biden’s pledge to appoint a black woman as a Justice. We think such a firing—or subjecting Shapiro to disciplinary action of any kind based on his tweet—would be contrary to basic academic freedom principles, which Georgetown rightly applies (1) to “all faculty,” including “lecturer” such as Shapiro, and not just tenure-track faculty, and (2) to “professional service” and “all the domains of [faculty] academic activity,” which would include public commentary by public intellectuals, and not just “research” and “teaching.”.....

But academic freedom protects Shapiro’s views, regardless of whether we agree with them or not. And debate about the President’s nomination, and about whether race and sex play a proper role in such nominations more generally, would be impoverished—at Georgetown and elsewhere—if this view could not be safely expressed in universities. Indeed, to the extent that people do think it’s proper for a President to promise to fill a position with a member of a particular group, they can only have real confidence in that conclusion if they know that the contrary view can be freely supported and discussed, and has been found unpersuasive on the merits rather than silenced by fear of firing. That is famously the way academic discourse about science operates. And it is true for moral and political judgments as well.

https://www.thefire.org/faculty-letter-in-support-of-ilya-shapiro-january-31-2022/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top