⚖️Law & Order Crimes and trials

https://www.reviewjournal.com/crime/homicides/new-fbi-records-offer-detailed-insights-into-route-91-mass-shooting-2753200/

Sounds like they still don't know why he did it. Not sure I buy the idea that the casino was treating him poorly, seeing as how they were making a lot of money off him. And if so, why not shoot up the casino instead of a concert?
 
https://twitter.com/ClownWorld_/status/1648710105180033024?s=20

I hate thieves. My unpopular opinion of the day is that we should allow the use of deadly force to protect property.
 
DocZaius said:
https://twitter.com/ClownWorld_/status/1648710105180033024?s=20

I hate thieves. My unpopular opinion of the day is that we should allow the use of deadly force to protect property.
Click to expand...

Yep.
 
I'm 100% for violence to to send a message to scumbags. It won't stop all of them, but it would certainly reduce crime. A piece of shit will gladly take a month in jail for a petty crime if it means not working for a living. Losing a hand for a life time would be a better deterrent.

Public hangings should definitely return. I say we start with pedophiles.
 
Juggs said:
I'm 100% for violence to to send a message to scumbags. It won't stop all of them, but it would certainly reduce crime. A piece of shit will gladly take a month in jail for a petty crime if it means not working for a living. Losing a hand for a life time would be a better deterrent.

Public hangings should definitely return. I say we start with pedophiles.
Click to expand...

With a noose made of barbed wire.
 
14 year old attempted a carjacking by my vet saturday. the majority of jackings here are all teenagers. I'm sure its got zero to do with schools being closed and gangs filling in the gap

https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/local/virginia/teen-taken-into-custody-after-attempted-carjacking-in-alexandria-virginia/65-dc957bf6-85e3-4b88-bd0a-3a82bdd3e439
 
Does this guy really think he's fooling anyone?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11999255/Rhode-Island-fugitive-Nicholas-Rossi-steams-glasses-furious-Dateline-interview.html
 
https://rdrama.net/post/169138/football-player-didnt-gangrape-a-girl

(spoiler for long cut-and-paste job):

https://old.reddit.com/r/nfl/commen...rmer_bills_punter_matt_araiza_wasnt?context=8

Matt Araiza was a punter, which is a relatively unimportant football position. But he could punt a ball really really far - so far he was nicknamed the "punt god." So when he left college for the NFL last year, he was a draft pick and a reddit superstar. Until he was accused of gang-raping a 17-year-old girl.

The girl claimed that:

“Once inside, Araiza threw [the girl] onto the bed face first,” the lawsuit read. “[The girl] went in and in and out of consciousness while” suffering through “the horrific gang rape.” It lasted an hour and a half, the lawsuit read, before she “stumbled out of the room bloody and crying” in part because “multiple piercings had ripped through the skin during the attack.”

The victim's lawyers shared photos of bruises and diary entries:

https://insideheadline.com/photos-a...araiza-sdsu-teammates-gang-rape-nbc-chicago/

https://twitter.com/dangilleon/status/1563252684127293440

https://old.reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/wysx8r/nbc_photos_allege_to_show_bruising_caused_by_matt/
And reddit reacted with rage that this MALE FEMINIST denied the charges:

https://old.reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/wyohxp/schefter_statement_from_bills_punter_matt_araiza/

https://old.reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/wzjfsu/joly_statement_from_matt_araizas_attorney_on/

Or that his parents refused to disown him:

https://old.reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/x14ys9/getzenberg_statement_from_the_parents_of_matt/
And they celebrated when the team released him:

https://old.reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/wzh1xj/schefter_bills_have_informed_rookie_punter_matt/

But then prosecutors refused to press charges, which still means he's guilty, right?

https://old.reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/zfch46/getzenberg_the_san_diego_county_district/

But wait, it must have still been statutory rape, unless he could PROVE that he thought she was 18. Then a video came out of her at the party, repeatedly saying that she's 18 and generally acting whorish:

https://youtu.be/xomuJISRa8k

And now the full story has come out and Reddit is now "I always knew he was innocent!"

https://old.reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/13c8gvm/prosecutors_former_bills_punter_matt_araiza_wasnt/

The real story:

The girl and some other high school friends became aware a party was being thrown at the house just a few blocks from the SDSU campus. The group let themselves in through a back gate.

Witness interviews from the party, including two of the girl’s own friends whom she arrived with, said that she didn’t appear to be drunk at the time. Other witnesses said the girl was telling people she was 18.
Click to expand...

The girl approached Araiza in the backyard when he was peeing and. According to the prosecutor, when she talked to the girl:

“The witnesses say … that shortly after you arrived at the party, you left and came back shortly thereafter,” [prosecutor] said. “And you told [a friend], ‘I just had sex.’ ... You didn’t appear unhappy. You appeared to be having fun and that the encounter on the side of the house with Matt, suspect Araiza, was consensual."

“you were approaching men at the party saying, ‘I want you to [expletive] me and if you don’t [expletive] me you’re a [expletive].”
Click to expand...

She went off with another guy:

“You had returned and then came back and said you had intercourse with a guy, this would have been the second person that would have been in the progression of the evening. Again, you’re described as being OK, not scared or distraught. Seemed happy, seemed consensual.

“Again, you’re not intoxicated at this point that anybody would know your intoxication level to the point that they would not be able to tell that you weren't able to give consent.”
Click to expand...

And as for the gangbang later that night:

video recordings of the incident in the bedroom made it impossible to determine, let alone prosecute anyone, on whether there was a gang r*pe at all that night, rather than consensual intercourse with the other men.
Click to expand...

Look now, people are deleting their old comments!
 
It started with Gen Z....You simply can't trust a woman anymore when she says she was raped by an athlete or any form of celebrity. Damn near every time, it turns out to be bullshit.
 
I thought Trump was funny in his deposition on the lady that accused him of rapping her in a dressing room. "She's not my type and neither are you" to the attorney representing her.

But then he blew it by saying the chick was Marla Maples in an old picture.
 
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12054769/Trans-woman-cleared-flashing-penis-YMCA-shes-FAT-genitals-visible.html

70669751-12054769-image-m-54_1683396417810.webp

'Quiet simply, the facts do not exist to support a find of guilt, as charges. Glines' genitalia was not visible as a result of other portions of her body covering same.'
Click to expand...
 
Jury finds trump liable for battery and defamation but not rape and orders him to pay 5 million.

Not sure how they go with battery but not rape when that is what she claimed. Must have been a fun deliberation.

"I say he just grabbed her pussy, like he talked about on the Access Hollywood tape".
.
 
pg. said:
Jury finds trump liable for battery and defamation but not rape and orders him to pay 5 million.

Not sure how they go with battery but not rape when that is what she claimed. Must have been a fun deliberation.

"I say he just grabbed her pussy, like he talked about on the Access Hollywood tape".
.
Click to expand...

The judge instructed the jury that if he gave her so much as an unwanted kiss, he'd be liable. The plaintiff was allowed to put on a ton of character evidence in this trial, which would probably have been inadmissible under Florida law. I don't know New York law, but I'm sure there's plenty of room for an appeal.

I also think it's bad policy to allow a defamation suit if you're simply denying someone's accusation against you. I know some states allow it (as they did with Bill Cosby), but it seems to be pretty unfair and actually allows people to defame others because the accused will be dissuaded from trying to defend themselves.

Never mind the statute of limitations issue here - a battery from 30 years ago? Very hard to defend, seems inconsistent with fairness and due process.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top