DocZaius said:
Evil gator said:
DocZaius said:
Thanos' mistake was that he didn't go far enough. If we take earth as a real-life example, wiping out 50% of sentient life is only going to delay the inevitable by about 50 years (at least using the 20th century as a model of a relatively "modern" society).
What is inevitable? From ancient civilizations to now people have predicted the end of the earth for various reasons, and they are always wrong.
They only have to be right once.
To be honest, I don't really disagree with you - the Malthusians never account for declining birth rates as the standard of living improves, or the use of technology to mitigate against food shortages and pollution.
But I think there are some disturbing trends that will probably change the way we live . The oceans are way over-fished, for example. Microplastics. Is peak oil still a thing? The theory seemed to make a certain amount of sense - sooner or later, fossil fuels will run out.
A lot of misconceptions out there mainly be had people who report on science aren’t scientists, are activists with an agenda, purveyors of bad science and mostly, don’t understand that we aren’t static, technology improves and changes.
people have been saying that about gas and oil for a long time, then a tech like fracking comes along. There’s plenty of options: nukes, hydro, coal isn’t running out, there are new developments all the time. Let the real market decide, not loud idiots
As far as micro plastics in the oceans this is behind a paywall but the people collecting samples appear to have contaminated them with their Patagonia jackets. Like a lot of reports, likely nowhere near as bad as reported
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/12/13/scientists-studying-microplastics-antarctica-discoverit-almost/
There are some actual problems like climate change, but they are often exaggerated to transfer money and power.
Anything that relies on modeling be very skeptical of