⚖️Law & Order Crimes and trials
- Thread starter Evil gator
- Start date
OP
OP
I read this in a book once
This is insane.....Boxes her in, punching the woman in the face and he gets no charges?
ufgators68
Contributor
Homie would have been eating lead.
Now I want to buy a Tesla... then go for a long drive.
Now I want to buy a Tesla... then go for a long drive.
I said the same. I saw a cyber truck the other day and no vandalism....yet.
OP
OP
I rode in a Tesla uber today and forgot how the door handles worn and was like is it gonna think I’m harming it
I have no idea how they work. Never been in one. I walked by one once 
OP
OP
They’re pretty common here
Police make 30 arrests a day for offensive online messages
Civil liberties groups say that the authorities are over-policing the internet and threatening free speech using vague laws
www.thetimes.com
:manonmoon: :reb:
OP
OP
Btw, megyn Kelly’s been going over that Nashville trans shooters manifesto on her podcast. The police and media really played down the trans angle. Trans can really be mental illness.
Didn't want to put it in the politics thread, but....
How is this legal? It sounds like they want to take "ballots" mailed in after the election while they continue to take 3 weeks to count?
Gatorbreeze
Contributor
An artificial intelligence-generated avatar was the source of contempt inside a New York courtroom after judges quickly realized the attorney arguing a case in front of them was not real.
The scene unfolded as Jerome Dewald, a plaintiff in an employment dispute, approached the stand of the New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division's First Judicial Department on March 26.
"The appellant has submitted a video for his argument," Justice Sallie Manzanet-Daniels said. "We will hear that video now."
The screen powered on, displaying a handsome young man wearing a button-down shirt, seemingly sitting in a home office.
"May it please the court, I come here today a humble pro se before a panel of five distinguished justices," the man said. Suddenly, Manzanet-Daniels interrupted the video and questioned the authenticity of the apparent attorney.
"Hold on," Manzanet-Daniels said. "Is that counsel for the case?"
Dewald confirmed the man was, in fact, his representative, and told the judges, "I generated that. That’s not a real person." The fallout was immediate as the judge clearly expressed her disapproval of Dewald’s choice to present an AI-generated video.
"It would have been nice to know that when you made your application," Manzanet-Daniels said. "You did not tell me that, sir."
Dewald reportedly submitted a letter apologizing to the court, explaining he did not have a lawyer representing him in the case and had not intended any harm.
"The court was really upset about it," Dewald told The Associated Press. "They chewed me up pretty good."
www.foxnews.com
The scene unfolded as Jerome Dewald, a plaintiff in an employment dispute, approached the stand of the New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division's First Judicial Department on March 26.
"The appellant has submitted a video for his argument," Justice Sallie Manzanet-Daniels said. "We will hear that video now."
The screen powered on, displaying a handsome young man wearing a button-down shirt, seemingly sitting in a home office.
"May it please the court, I come here today a humble pro se before a panel of five distinguished justices," the man said. Suddenly, Manzanet-Daniels interrupted the video and questioned the authenticity of the apparent attorney.
"Hold on," Manzanet-Daniels said. "Is that counsel for the case?"
Dewald confirmed the man was, in fact, his representative, and told the judges, "I generated that. That’s not a real person." The fallout was immediate as the judge clearly expressed her disapproval of Dewald’s choice to present an AI-generated video.
"It would have been nice to know that when you made your application," Manzanet-Daniels said. "You did not tell me that, sir."
Dewald reportedly submitted a letter apologizing to the court, explaining he did not have a lawyer representing him in the case and had not intended any harm.
"The court was really upset about it," Dewald told The Associated Press. "They chewed me up pretty good."
AI-generated attorney outrages judge who scolds man over courtroom fake: ‘not a real person’
A New York man used an AI-avatar to argue his case in front of a panel of judges, sparking outrage within the courtroom during his legal proceedings.
www.foxnews.com
OP
OP
Safest town in Virginia defunds its police. Lets see how this goes
wjla.com
Purcellville Town Council votes in favor of eliminating its police department
Purcellville Town Council votes in favor of eliminating its police department
wjla.com
An artificial intelligence-generated avatar was the source of contempt inside a New York courtroom after judges quickly realized the attorney arguing a case in front of them was not real.
The scene unfolded as Jerome Dewald, a plaintiff in an employment dispute, approached the stand of the New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division's First Judicial Department on March 26.
"The appellant has submitted a video for his argument," Justice Sallie Manzanet-Daniels said. "We will hear that video now."
The screen powered on, displaying a handsome young man wearing a button-down shirt, seemingly sitting in a home office.
"May it please the court, I come here today a humble pro se before a panel of five distinguished justices," the man said. Suddenly, Manzanet-Daniels interrupted the video and questioned the authenticity of the apparent attorney.
"Hold on," Manzanet-Daniels said. "Is that counsel for the case?"
Dewald confirmed the man was, in fact, his representative, and told the judges, "I generated that. That’s not a real person." The fallout was immediate as the judge clearly expressed her disapproval of Dewald’s choice to present an AI-generated video.
"It would have been nice to know that when you made your application," Manzanet-Daniels said. "You did not tell me that, sir."
Dewald reportedly submitted a letter apologizing to the court, explaining he did not have a lawyer representing him in the case and had not intended any harm.
"The court was really upset about it," Dewald told The Associated Press. "They chewed me up pretty good."
AI-generated attorney outrages judge who scolds man over courtroom fake: ‘not a real person’
A New York man used an AI-avatar to argue his case in front of a panel of judges, sparking outrage within the courtroom during his legal proceedings.
That's insane. First of all I am surprised that any court allows a video submission in lieu of an actual appearance. Second, what made him think this was a good idea? Finally, the judge said something about him using the court as a means to advance his business - which is of course an AI legal service:
(link).
OP
OP
Weird
OP
OP
The comments are the best part of it
Weezer Member's Wife Shot By Cops in Shootout, Booked for Attempted Murder
The wife of Weezer bassist Scott Shriner was shot by cops during a wild chase in L.A. ... TMZ has learned, and then she was booked for attempted murder.
www.tmz.com
Didn't we discuss what happens to those girls who go to the middle east to sell themselves?
OP
OP
Remember when the media refused to cover any of this? I sure do
And they still won't.
OP
OP
My guess as to what happened - she was loaded, had an intruder show up, grabbed a gun, then waved it around and/or shot at policeWeezer Member's Wife Shot By Cops in Shootout, Booked for Attempted Murder
The wife of Weezer bassist Scott Shriner was shot by cops during a wild chase in L.A. ... TMZ has learned, and then she was booked for attempted murder.
Didn't we discuss what happens to those girls who go to the middle east to sell themselves?