Obama and the New Party

[DocZaius]

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/ ... nley-kurtz

On the evening of January 11, 1996, while Mitt Romney was in the final years of his run as the head of Bain Capital, Barack Obama formally joined the New Party, which was deeply hostile to the mainstream of the Democratic party and even to American capitalism. In 2008, candidate Obama deceived the American public about his potentially damaging tie to this third party. The issue remains as fresh as today’s headlines, as Romney argues that Obama is trying to move the United States toward European-style social democracy, which was precisely the New Party’s goal.
In late October 2008, when I wrote here at National Review Online that Obama had been a member of the New Party, his campaign sharply denied it, calling my claim a “crackpot smear.” Fight the Smears, an official Obama-campaign website, staunchly maintained that “Barack has been a member of only one political party, the Democratic Party.” I rebutted this, but the debate was never taken up by the mainstream press.
Recently obtained evidence from the updated records of Illinois ACORN at the Wisconsin Historical Society now definitively establishes that Obama was a member of the New Party. He also signed a “contract” promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.
Minutes of the meeting on January 11, 1996, of the New Party’s Chicago chapter read as follows:[INDENT]Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He signed the New Party “Candidate Contract” and requested an endorsement from the New Party. He also joined the New Party.

[/INDENT]
Consistent with this, a roster of the Chicago chapter of the New Party from early 1997 lists Obama as a member, with January 11, 1996, indicated as the date he joined.

Kurtz seems to have evidence that Obama was a member of the New Party and that he and his people lied about it when confronted with it in 2008.

[G8RKyle]

I read that but I wasn't sure exactly why it was a big deal. I don't know anything about the New Party, but politicians lie all the time during campaigns in order to cover up their past.

[DocZaius]

I'm not sure why it's a big deal, either, but the author of the article indicates that the New Party is a radical leftist organization. I guess I'll have to wait for my next issue of National Review to find out.


/not actually a national review subscriber

[MinGator]

Affiliated or not he acts in such a way anyhow.