Page 3 of 3
The Dark Knight
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:11 am
by a1bion
I'd nail Maggie Gyllenwhatsit.
The Dark Knight
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:15 am
by texgator
I'd nail Jake Gyllenhall.
a1's going brokeback.....nttiawwt.
The Dark Knight
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:24 am
by TheTodd
Maggie is hawt you fuck. Greatest movie ever, no. Great summer flick, hell yes.
The Dark Knight
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:29 am
by TTBHG
Maggie is hawt you fuck.
You need to get laid in a bad kinda way.
The Dark Knight
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:37 am
by DocZaius
Maggie looks like a basset hound in this movie.
The Dark Knight
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:03 pm
by TheTodd
The Dark Knight
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:16 pm
by Tipmoose
How old was she when that pic was taken?
The Dark Knight
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:17 pm
by Toothy
That hour-too-long thing: yeah. I feel you. Let us the fuck out already.
The New Yorker, which is one of the few publications left whose critics are not a bunch of back-door crack whores to the movie industry, panned the new movie. Incoherent, chopped-up action sequences; substitution of thudding violence for the weird charm and humor of the first couple of Batman flicks; pinched, monotonal performance by Bale. They raved about Ledger too, by the way.
The Dark Knight
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:18 pm
by Toothy
How old was she when that pic was taken?
Old enough for me, baby.
The Dark Knight
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:18 pm
by TheTodd
I believe it was within the past two years or something like that. I remember reading something about her modeling for a lingerie line just after having a kid I think. I reserve the right to be wrong of course.
The Dark Knight
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 3:19 pm
by DocZaius
That hour-too-long thing: yeah. I feel you. Let us the fuck out already.
The New Yorker, which is one of the few publications left whose critics are not a bunch of back-door crack whores to the movie industry, panned the new movie. Incoherent, chopped-up action sequences; substitution of thudding violence for the weird charm and humor of the first couple of Batman flicks; pinched, monotonal performance by Bale. They raved about Ledger too, by the way.
Isn't that the same publication with the incomprehensible cartoons?
It was a touch too long, but it didn't bother me that much. And on reflection, they're spot-on about Bale - he was pretty flat, but I think it was more the writing than his acting (though his raspy Batman voice really annoys me). Let's face it: this movie wasn't really about Batman. It was more about Dent and the Joker.
Also, I don't know what "weird charm and humor" was present in
Begins. If
Batman & Robin is an example of that charm and humor, then I'll be saying "no thank you." I prefer my Batman without nipples, my villains without the punny one-liners of Arnold Schwarzenegger's Mr. Freeze and my Gotham City without a rainbow of colors.
EDIT: I just realized you said the "first" couple of Batman flicks, not the "last" couple. Anyway, they're right: Nolan's Batman lives in a much dimmer and more realistic world than Burton's. Don't get me wrong - I thought Burton did a great job, too, even with
Batman Returns. It's just two different interpretations of the same source material, much like the comic books have gone through several different versions of Batman through the years.
EDIT 2: Shit, I can't believe I wrote that much about a comic book movie.
The Dark Knight
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 4:03 pm
by texgator
Know how I know you're they?
The Dark Knight
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 7:59 pm
by Weegie
EDIT 2: Shit, I can't believe I wrote that much about a comic book movie.
Doc . . . have you started playing WoW?
The Dark Knight
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:34 pm
by annarborgator
One of the gheyest threads evar in the BA.
The Dark Knight
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 12:06 am
by TheTodd
One of the gheyest threads evar in the BA.
that didn't have rad posting pics of dongs in it
The Dark Knight
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 8:00 am
by G8RKyle
Saw the movie last night. Freakin' awesome. Leslie was disturbed, but I didn't find the Joker or Two-Face to be that scary.
The Dark Knight
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 9:42 am
by slideman67
Begins[/i]. If Batman & Robin is an example of that charm and humor, then I'll be saying "no thank you." I prefer my Batman without nipples, my villains without the punny one-liners of Arnold Schwarzenegger's Mr. Freeze and my Gotham City without a rainbow of colors.
EDIT: I just realized you said the "first" couple of Batman flicks, not the "last" couple. Anyway, they're right: Nolan's Batman lives in a much dimmer and more realistic world than Burton's. Don't get me wrong - I thought Burton did a great job, too, even with Batman Returns. It's just two different interpretations of the same source material, much like the comic books have gone through several different versions of Batman through the years.
EDIT 2: Shit, I can't believe I wrote that much about a comic book movie.
I would agree with Doc about Bale.
We saw this movie yesterday afternoon in the IMAX theater. I am a huge comic book fan and a fan of Batman in particular. While I think this is a fantastic movie, I found myself emotionally drained after this film. It is very dark and disturbing, and Ledger gives a sadistic performance as the Joker - an agent of pure evil and chaos. I'm not sure if I want to see this film again.
They definitely left room for a sequel. They can't leave the story how they left it. I just don't know how they are going to top this movie.
Is it just me, or did Gotham City clean up quite a bit since the previous movie?
I would definitely think twice about letting small children watch this movie. Like I said, I was disturbed by it. The movie could definitely give a child nightmares. The Two Face makeup especially.
The Dark Knight
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:47 am
by apexgator
I would definitely think twice about letting small children watch this movie. Like I said, I was disturbed by it. The movie could definitely give a child nightmares. The Two Face makeup especially.
Kyle seemed to come away unscathed.
The Dark Knight
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:37 am
by G8RKyle
Yeah, but that's because I draw that anatomical stuff all the time.