This will not stand

DocZaius · Post by **DocZaius** » Tue Sep 04, 2012 11:48 am

http://www.gatorzone.com/harry/blog/1016

Exhibit number 23,323 why no one likes Aggie.

IHateUGAlyDawgs · Post by **IHateUGAlyDawgs** » Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:05 pm

I'd like to say they'll get what they have coming, but I'm afraid after what I saw Saturday that we're just going to have to bend over and take it.

DocZaius · Post by **DocZaius** » Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:06 pm

Got to be at troll, right? Best academics? Cleanest program? "Tradition?"

DocZaius · Post by **DocZaius** » Tue Sep 04, 2012 8:16 pm

Great thread at ShaggyBevo about this: http://www.shaggybevo.com/board/showthread.php?t=116988

G8RKyle · Post by **G8RKyle** » Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:12 am

Real football? Real tradition? I think they have like one National Championship, and that was a long time ago.

DocZaius · Post by **DocZaius** » Wed Sep 05, 2012 10:44 am

^1939, if I remember correctly, although they are now claiming at least two more, based on some kind of retroactive awarding of championships. Kind of like how Bama claims 12 (more?) national titles.

From Wikipedia:
[h=4]National championships (3)[/h]Until 2012 Texas A&M claimed just one national title, voted No. 1 by the AP Poll shortly after its inception along with No. 1 in 8 of the 12 other major polls, after the 1939 season.Southern California also claim this title through the Dickinson System;[SUP][6][/SUP] however, this was the only poll that year in which USC finished No. 1.[SUP][7][/SUP][SUP][8][/SUP] In 2012, Texas A&M added claims to two additional national championships.[SUP][9][/SUP][SUP][10][/SUP] The 1919 team finished 10–0–0 and unscored upon, earning a retroactive national title by ten selectors, including the Billingsley Report and National Championship Foundation.[SUP][11][/SUP][SUP][12][/SUP] The 1927 team finished 8–0–1, with a tie against TCU in Fort Worth, Texas, earning a retroactive national title by the Sagarin Rating and the Sagarin ELO-Chess.[SUP][13][/SUP]
Additionally, the 1917 team finished 8–0–0 and unscored upon, earning a retroactive national title by 1st-N-Goal and James Howell, but Texas A&M does not claim this as a national championship.[SUP][14][/SUP]

G8RKyle · Post by **G8RKyle** » Wed Sep 05, 2012 1:18 pm

I don't count those computer based retroactive ones.

DocZaius · Post by **DocZaius** » Wed Sep 05, 2012 4:00 pm

Nobody in their right mind does. Tells you something about the Aggies, though, doesn't it?

IHateUGAlyDawgs · Post by **IHateUGAlyDawgs** » Mon Sep 10, 2012 9:41 am

I am here to eat my crow. Served Med. Rare please.

radbag · Post by **radbag** » Mon Sep 10, 2012 9:48 am

[quote=IHateUGAlyDawgs]I am here to eat my crow. Served Med. Rare please.[/QUOTE]
win, win situation

DocZaius · Post by **DocZaius** » Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:13 am

[quote=IHateUGAlyDawgs]I am here to eat my crow. Served Med. Rare please.[/QUOTE]

Eh, us losing to Aggy wasn't a crazy prediction. The way we played in the first half, it could have easily gone the other way.

DocZaius · Post by **DocZaius** » Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:05 pm

slideman67 · Post by **slideman67** » Mon Sep 10, 2012 3:01 pm

The prevailing rumor in Aggieland was that this billboard was put up by Texas fans to piss us off. They don't go by Aggie Nation and the billboards owner got a cease and decist from TAMU about this board. FYI.

DocZaius · Post by **DocZaius** » Mon Sep 10, 2012 3:51 pm

^Yeah, I read that, not sure I believe it.