Outback Bowl Thread

Fuckbeans.
slideman67
Posts: 3060
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:34 pm

Outback Bowl Thread

Post by slideman67 »

And I will add the Big 10's two divisions really should be called "SEC victims" and "Future SEC victims". LOL
Now that's funny!

Those names are overwhelmingly stupid!
If the devil had a name, it'd be Chuck Finley.
radbag
Posts: 15809
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:59 am

Outback Bowl Thread

Post by radbag »


Third and six: you knew we'd have an open receiver three yards downfield, and you knew Brantley would throw to him.

open??? he's throwing to the check down receiver whether he's open or not.
radbag
Posts: 15809
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:59 am

Outback Bowl Thread

Post by radbag »




We've even found a way to make Chas Henry look lame today.
he rallied after that early shank...he was banging FGs like....like he was a FG kicker...hehehe
radbag
Posts: 15809
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:59 am

Outback Bowl Thread

Post by radbag »

Why the F is Brantley still in this game? And WTF was that?
haha...first pass...FIRST OFFENSIVE PLAY...you KNEW he was going to throw the pick....just didn't want it to be the first offensive play...that was REAL offensive if you know what i mean.
radbag
Posts: 15809
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:59 am

Outback Bowl Thread

Post by radbag »

I think a lot of it has to do with crappy blocking by the O line

And why aren't we doing the reverse more?
omarius hines (sp) is a HOSS...i just think overusing the misdirection play affects its effectiveness if you know what i mean...i think the oline had one of its better games working as a unit...pouncey and gang were very aggressive off the ball imo...and they were finishing blocks and finishing them off downfield...i thought they did well
radbag
Posts: 15809
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:59 am

Outback Bowl Thread

Post by radbag »

The Big 10 should've just auctioned off the naming rights. Having a "Dr. Pepper Division" and a "Cialis Division" would be preferable to Leaders/Legends, plus you could've pocketed some decent cash.
capitalist!
radbag
Posts: 15809
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:59 am

Outback Bowl Thread

Post by radbag »

can anyone tell me why moody didn't sniff the field at all?
TheTodd
Posts: 7009
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:57 pm

Outback Bowl Thread

Post by TheTodd »

injury? Just a guess.
“The Knave abideth.” I dare speak not for thee, but this maketh me to be of good comfort; I deem it well that he be out there, the Knave, being of good ease for we sinners.
annarborgator
Posts: 8886
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:48 pm

Outback Bowl Thread

Post by annarborgator »

can anyone tell me why moody didn't sniff the field at all?
Because he's really, really shitty.
I've never met a retarded person who wasn't smiling.
slideman67
Posts: 3060
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:34 pm

Outback Bowl Thread

Post by slideman67 »

I think a lot of it has to do with crappy blocking by the O line

And why aren't we doing the reverse more?
omarius hines (sp) is a HOSS...i just think overusing the misdirection play affects its effectiveness if you know what i mean...i think the oline had one of its better games working as a unit...pouncey and gang were very aggressive off the ball imo...and they were finishing blocks and finishing them off downfield...i thought they did well
For this game, I agree that they did well. And since I was watching at home and could actually hear the announcers, I found it very interesting how well they pointed out how the O Line was doing.
If the devil had a name, it'd be Chuck Finley.
TheTodd
Posts: 7009
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:57 pm

Outback Bowl Thread

Post by TheTodd »

what did they say slider?
“The Knave abideth.” I dare speak not for thee, but this maketh me to be of good comfort; I deem it well that he be out there, the Knave, being of good ease for we sinners.
radbag
Posts: 15809
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:59 am

Outback Bowl Thread

Post by radbag »

i noticed the praise for the o-line as well which makes me think that gruden and company hadn't watched too many UF games this year.

as far as what they were saying, they profiled a lot of pounceys blocks downfield...they praised the units effort throughout...just general praise and isolation shots of the o-line...a lot of it i must say...but deserved.
slideman67
Posts: 3060
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:34 pm

Outback Bowl Thread

Post by slideman67 »

Exactly Todd. Rad pretty much sums it up.

We did have one bad snap though. Hopefully this problem will be fixed.
If the devil had a name, it'd be Chuck Finley.
G8rMom7
Posts: 12095
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:02 pm

Outback Bowl Thread

Post by G8rMom7 »

^^^well it should be since Pouncey will be gone next season.
Okay, let's try this!

Image
radbag
Posts: 15809
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:59 am

Outback Bowl Thread

Post by radbag »

Exactly Todd. Rad pretty much sums it up.

We did have one bad snap though. Hopefully this problem will be fixed.
gruden had eluded to the fact that tebow corralled all those errant snaps last year so basically, he's saying - maurkice pouncey would've had the same issues mike pouncey was having had he had brantley instead of tebow
Post Reply