https://www.currentaffairs.org/2022/05/the-annihilation-of-florida-an-overlooked-national-tragedy
This seems a bit hysterical
This seems a bit hysterical
wetlands get replaced at 2:1 or 4:1 ratio, too.Juggs said:That road has had Floridian environmentalists and old timers in an uproar for a while now. I think Pan knows more about it.
The reaction is a tad hyperbolic, but it is true that developers have been buying out ranchers pretty rapidly. They're right about FDOT though. It will destroy farms. My ancestor owned a huge portion of what is now in Alachua city limits as a farm....until they put I75 right through it and gave him no access to half his land and he lost a lot in selling it off at that time. What farmer or owner wants to drive 10,15, 20 minutes to the nearest bridge so they can access the rest of their land due to an unnecessary road to BFE? It's stupid.
Their biggest over reaction is to the wetlands impact though. We work around that shit all the time and it's not like it's a huge swatch of land. The wetlands don't get replaced, they get relocated. That part really isn't a big deal.
Yeah, they're lunatics and only hurt their cause. Maybe people would listen if they were more rational about it isntead of freaking out over a field mouse.Evil gator said:wetlands get replaced at 2:1 or 4:1 ratio, too.Juggs said:That road has had Floridian environmentalists and old timers in an uproar for a while now. I think Pan knows more about it.
The reaction is a tad hyperbolic, but it is true that developers have been buying out ranchers pretty rapidly. They're right about FDOT though. It will destroy farms. My ancestor owned a huge portion of what is now in Alachua city limits as a farm....until they put I75 right through it and gave him no access to half his land and he lost a lot in selling it off at that time. What farmer or owner wants to drive 10,15, 20 minutes to the nearest bridge so they can access the rest of their land due to an unnecessary road to BFE? It's stupid.
Their biggest over reaction is to the wetlands impact though. We work around that shit all the time and it's not like it's a huge swatch of land. The wetlands don't get replaced, they get relocated. That part really isn't a big deal.
i just watched an EPA "stakeholder" engagement meeting last night and there was this one "intersectional" person who was talking about some scifi comic where the corporations owned all the water in the world and we were almost there! Enviros can't say anything unless its hysterical
Evil gator said:i just watched an EPA "stakeholder" engagement meeting last night and there was this one "intersectional" person who was talking about some scifi comic where the corporations owned all the water in the world and we were almost there! Enviros can't say anything unless its hysterical
DocZaius said:Evil gator said:i just watched an EPA "stakeholder" engagement meeting last night and there was this one "intersectional" person who was talking about some scifi comic where the corporations owned all the water in the world and we were almost there! Enviros can't say anything unless its hysterical
Seems like everything is a pop-culture analogy to them, too. Did xe/xim quote Harry Potter, too?
I saw we kill them, too.Evil gator said:DocZaius said:Evil gator said:i just watched an EPA "stakeholder" engagement meeting last night and there was this one "intersectional" person who was talking about some scifi comic where the corporations owned all the water in the world and we were almost there! Enviros can't say anything unless its hysterical
Seems like everything is a pop-culture analogy to them, too. Did xe/xim quote Harry Potter, too?
there's nothing I loathe more about this admin and dems in general is that I'm supposed to respect someone for "speaking their truth" even if they are idiotic and out of their depth. Everyone else on this meeting made substantive comments even if I disagree with them.
their linkedin is "Food Systems Futurist and JEDI Activist" wtf