• If you're having issues logging in, please email me at doczaius69@gmail.com

⚖️Law & Order All right, who's gonna be rich?

pg. said:
Up to $30,000?

The jury has to decide how aggregious the dick pic is?
Click to expand...

At least they put a cap on it. Is a bigger one worth more or less?

I'm more curious about the jurisdictional challenges this might impose. Let's say some Indian dude sends a dick pic to a California girl - do the California courts automatically have jurisdiction? How do you serve some street-shitter in New Delhi? Can you successfully unmask @HungGuy69420 when he's behind 7 Russian proxy servers and a VPN?
 
Related:

https://www.insider.com/southwest-pilot-threatened-going-home-because-people-were-airdropping-nudes-2022-8

Cyberflashing, the practice of sending unsolicited and explicit photos to nearby strangers, is not a new problem. In a 2017 Pew Research Center report, 53% of women ages 18-29 reported having been sent unsolicited obscene images (compared to 37% of men within the same range). A 2021 report found that 33% of women under 35 reported having been sexually harassed online in general — three times more often than men within the same age range.
Click to expand...

I'm 47, male, and have never been sent an unsolicited obscene image.

Is there something wrong with me? Am I just ugly?
 
So you can’t send unsolicited dick pics in California but they can force porn onto your child without consent. Logical.

And neither have I, doc. In fact I’ve only ever sent them to 1 person. Women are too vindictive to trust them crazy bitches with that :lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top