Welp, NCAA...
Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:17 am
This speaks for itself.
In 2008, as big money poured into the coffers of college athletics, the N.C.A.A. faced a growing chorus of criticism that student-athletes were being exploited.
But N.C.A.A. executives, in private communications, opposed any notion that college football and basketball players should get a cut of the profits.
“With regard to the student-athlete, I think the focus on exploitation may be misplaced, and maybe it is not our duty to protect the student-athlete,” David Berst, a senior N.C.A.A. executive, wrote in an August 2008 e-mail to the head of the organization.
(...)
A review of numerous e-mails sent by N.C.A.A. officials and video game executives suggests that the N.C.A.A. has long had a goal of ensuring it makes as much money as possible while doing everything it can to keep students from being paid.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/20/sport ... ml?hp&_r=0In its initial public statement about the litigation, the N.C.A.A. noted that its agreement with E.A. Sports, an Electronic Arts brand, prohibited the names and pictures of current student-athletes, adding that “we are confident no such use has occurred.”
But behind the scenes, the college athletics world realized what was at stake.
“This whole area of name and likeness and the N.C.A.A. is a disaster leading to a catastrophe as far as I can tell,” the Nebraska chancellor Harvey Perlman, who served on the N.C.A.A.’s board of directors, wrote soon after the O’Bannon lawsuit was filed. “I’m still trying to figure out by what authority the N.C.A.A. licenses these rights to the game makers and others.”
Dan Beebe, then the commissioner of the Big 12 Conference, wrote back that, to his knowledge, the N.C.A.A. never granted permission to game makers to use such likenesses. Beebe then had an exchange of e-mails with Christine Plonsky from Texas, who had been part of the presidential task force on commercialism.
“Has our N.C.A.A. board decided not to defend the notion that playing N.C.A.A. sports is not forced?” Plonsky wrote. “It is a voluntary sign-up. We’re like a version of the Army.”
Referring to student-athletes, she added: “We have things we have to do a certain way to raise funds and pay for the scholarships and other things that s-a’s and their parents expect. I view these cases as being the result of the entitlement attitude we’ve created in our revenue sports.”
Plonsky went on to say that if E.A. Sports “loses a case based on depiction of a nameless, faceless player in a school uniform, then our TV rights fees are destined to be in court next.”