The Back Alley Archives

I'm guessing that they couldn't find any more Swamp Gas mods that wanted to deal with the crap rad. I agree that it would be their job though and that is why I quit being a SG mod long ago, cause I didn't want to deal with all the chit going on in there.

Also, I thought that Ray et al operated on a "any traffic is good traffic" mentality. This maneuver seems to be a great departure from that position...

Which one of you mooks is DaJacker?

I thought just replying to random threads with a "lol" would serve two purposes: jack up my post count (to lend legitimacy when I escalate things); and to see if anyone notices when it's inappropriate.

I thought just replying to random threads with a "lol" would serve two purposes: jack up my post count (to lend legitimacy when I escalate things); and to see if anyone notices when it's inappropriate.

i just pm'd growl that you were daJacker.

i want to regain his confidence so as to restore my post count. [img]{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_rolleyes.gif[/img]

Ahhh....so you can still read the forums, but when you want to post for the first time, I guess you get the message that Doc posted.

TheTodd said...
It could backfire in their face. I agree that it certainly will stop many from joining, especially those that just want to post a comment or two. I mean, you don't start posting on GC with the thought you are going to be going there everyday, multiple times a day. You start by posting a comment or two in some interesting threads and get sucked in that way.

I agree Todd.

Which one of you mooks is DaJacker?

Hi.

WTF??
DaJacker, care to explain your sick humor? I knew a girl who was murdered by Ted Bundy. Is that funny to you?
AnnArborGator, I'll call you out. Are you saying that a simple wtf? is perpetrating a personal attack?

Considering the context, yes. It was obviously a knee-jerk reaction, similar to the one you had. Still, the "^^^" obviously directed the insulting, degrading question of "wtf?" toward a single, solitary poster as if something is wrong with DaJacker simply because they can find humor where others cannot. I thought the Pub was here for laughs?

Your attack on DaJacker was much more direct. Not sure how you can judge humor as sick when you have literally no idea what actually prompted the innocent "LOL" posted by DaJacker. So now we have two personal attacks. And they were both utterly and entirely baseless and not founded on any rational thought.

HTH (Hope That Helps)

ive never hated you. i don't know you. i dont know all these little clicks on these boards. your posts are generally interesting, so what you said about my comment kinda got to me, i think i've repped comments of yours in the past...i mean, that lone 'lol' out there is freaky, its sorta sociopathic, its what we in medical call an 'innapropriate reponse' ....
so peace,man, i have no problems with you....lets keep it that way.